Well a new October Surprise against Donald Trump just dropped and I’m sorry but you have to have some serious TDS to think this new allegation is going to sway anybody, but let’s get into it;
The gossip rag The Guardian has published a lengthy and intentionally misleading piece about how some Swimsuit model named Stacey Williams was allegedly groped by Trump back in 1993.
The big reveal and the meat of the allegation is that they were “introduced” by Epstein, yes that Epstein.
The entire allegation is that Epstein one day just opted to go visit his friend at Trump Tower and the second that Trump met Williams, Trump put his hands all over her body and allegedly smiled at Epstein who later scolded her for letting Trump do what he did and she felt like it was, and I quote, “some twisted game” between them.
Even if we set aside how convenient it is that the only material witness offed himself 5 years ago, the fact that she dated a known abuser - something we’re supposed to ignore because it’s possible for Epstein to have hidden his proclivities from somebody he dated - the same isn’t allowed for anybody who knew Epstein because something something this allegation.
Being friends with Epstein is supposed to be damning for Trump. Dating Epstein, at the same he was palling around with Ghislaine Maxwell, is supposed to be overlooked for Williams.
We’re also going to set aside how convenient this timing is and how it’s being released during an election because that’ll likely be a main talking point elsewhere.
What I find odd, and dishonestly telling, is that this allegation doesn’t even fit in with the villainy that is Jeffrey Epstein.
For some context here, Stacey Williams was born in 1968 which means that she was 25 at the time of the alleged incident in 1993.
Epstein wouldn’t even buy his compound on Little Saint James island for another 5 years in ‘98 and Epstein wouldn’t even be investigated for any crimes until 2005.
Obviously this doesn’t mean that Epstein wasn’t likely a monster before that time, I’m just not sure how it’s relevant as more than a footnote based on the context.
Epstein is known for allegedly trafficking children, so how does that track with once introducing Trump to a 25 year old model - an adult even by liberal math?
The ironic twist here is that the Harris campaign - which is attached at the hip to the Biden administration - wants you to believe Trump and Epstein were connected even on the thinnest of allegations but don’t dare ask them to look behind the curtain that is Jeffrey's little black book.
Why? Because that would require them to admit that they’ve refused to prosecute even one person tied to Epstein or Maxwell even after her conviction in 2021 considering it was the Trump administration who brought charges against Maxwell.
You don’t get to bitch and moan about Trump’s behavior when you cosign Bill Clinton’s, Mr. Lolita Express himself.
Frankly, it’s difficult to take people’s outrage about these types of allegations seriously when it’s so blatantly selective but what’s more surprising than anything is that this was sold as a bombshell even after Stormy Daniels & E. Jean Carrol failed to derail the Trump Train.
I feel like it falls into the internet’s definition of insanity to watch the left dredge up a 31 year old allegation against Trump - which can’t be proven - as if that’s supposed to offset your inability to afford groceries despite everything you already knew about him.
But somehow here we are.
Cheers.